PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1309-0682

Orjinal Araştırma Makalesi | Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2020, Cil. 14(31) 577-591

English Teachers’ Views on Important Factors and Problems of Educational Change

Kürşat Cesur

ss. 577 - 591   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2020.234.27   |  Makale No: MANU-1912-30-0003.R1

Yayın tarihi: Mart 18, 2020  |   Okunma Sayısı: 36  |  İndirilme Sayısı: 111


Özet

With recent developments, there have been so many changes in many fields. It is inevitable that educational system has also changed a lot in Turkey. In this respect, this study aims to examine the English teachers’ views on the implementation stage of the educational changes. To achieve this aim, qualitative research methodology was followed. Purposeful sampling was used and 84 English teachers participated in the study. To elicit English teachers’ responses about the most important factors for implementing educational change and the most common problems faced during the implementation process of educational change, two open-ended questions were directed to the participants using Google Forms document. Qualitative data collected from 84 English teachers were analysed using content analysis, and the themes and codes were categorized for each question. The findings indicated that according the teachers, the most important factors for a successful change are leaders, teachers, students, parents, and other factors such as educational system, and facilities, etc. Most of the participants believed that being open to improvement, and interacting with one another are key to successful educational change. As for the most frequently faced problems; the inadequacy of capacity building, the lack of cooperation between teachers, principals, parents and the society; negative attitudes, and resistance to change; lack of job satisfaction and motivation; inconvenience of schools’ physical conditions were noted by the participant teachers. As the most striking suggestion, change planners and policy makers should take classroom teachers’ needs and expectations into consideration before determining educational changes. Further implications and suggestions were presented at the end of the study.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Educational change; factors affecting successful change; problems of educational change


Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır?

APA 6th edition
Cesur, K. (2020). English Teachers’ Views on Important Factors and Problems of Educational Change . Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(31), 577-591. doi: 10.29329/mjer.2020.234.27

Harvard
Cesur, K. (2020). English Teachers’ Views on Important Factors and Problems of Educational Change . Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(31), pp. 577-591.

Chicago 16th edition
Cesur, Kursat (2020). "English Teachers’ Views on Important Factors and Problems of Educational Change ". Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 14 (31):577-591. doi:10.29329/mjer.2020.234.27.

Kaynakça
  1. Aksit, N. (2007). Educational reform in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(2), 129-137. [Google Scholar]
  2. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Factors affecting implementation and continuation. (Vol. 7). Santa Monica, CA: Rand. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bulut, M. (2007). Curriculum reform in Turkey: A case of primary school mathematics curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 203-212. [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell, R. (1985). Developing the primary school curriculum. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [Google Scholar]
  5. Carless, S. A. (1998). Assessing the discriminant validity of transformational leader behaviour as measured by the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71(4), 353-358. [Google Scholar]
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. [Google Scholar]
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (2nd ed.), Los Angeles: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  8. Duru, A., & Korkmaz, H. (2010). Teachers’ views about a new mathematics curriculum and difficulties encountering curriculum change. Hacettepe University of Journal of Education, 38, 67-81. [Google Scholar]
  9. Eraslan, A. (2013). Teachers’ reflections on the implementation of the new elementary school mathematics curriculum in Turkey. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2), 152-165. [Google Scholar]
  10. Erarslan, A. (2019). Factors affecting the implementation of primary school English language teaching programs in Turkey. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 7-22.  [Google Scholar]
  11. Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fink, D., & Stoll, L. (1998). Educational change: Easier said than done. In A. Hargreaves, (Ed.). Extending educational change: International handbook of educational change. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer, 17-41. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fullan, M. (1985). Change processes and strategies at the local level. The Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 391-421. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fullan, M. (1991). Curriculum implementation. In A. Lewy, (Ed.). The international encyclopaedia of curriculum. New York: Pergamon Press, 378-384. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. UK, London: Routledge Falmer. [Google Scholar]
  18. Glickman, C. D., Allen, L., & Lunsford, B. F. (1994). Factors affecting school change. Journal of Staff Development. 15(3), 38-41. [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2000). Behaviour in organisations: Understanding and managing the human side of the work. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gunter, H. (2001). Critical approaches to leadership in education. Journal of Educational Inquiry. 2(2), 94-108. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gustavson, C. G. (1955). A preface to history. Toronto: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  22. Han, Ç. (2011). Eğitimsel değişim ve öğretmen: Biyoloji öğretmenlerinin yeni öğretim programı hakkındaki kişisel teorileri üzerine etnografik bir durum araştırması. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotions of teaching and educational change. In A. Hargreaves, (Ed.). Extending educational change: International handbook of educational change. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer, 278-295. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hargreaves, A. (2009). A decade of educational changes and a defining moment of opportunity: An introduction. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2-3), 89-100. [Google Scholar]
  25. Huberman, A. M. (1973). Understanding change in education: An introduction. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kanter, R. M. (2004). Confidence: How winning and losing streaks begin and end. New York: Crown Business. [Google Scholar]
  27. Keleş, Ö., Bakar, E., & Koçakoğlu, M. (2009). Views of national education deputy principles on renovated primary education curricula. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 17(3), 849-870.  [Google Scholar]
  28. Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee, J. C. K., & Yin, H. B. (2010). Curriculum policy implementation in China: Interactions between policy designs, place and people. Curriculum and Teaching, 25(2), 31-53. [Google Scholar]
  30. Leithwood, K. (2008). Should educational leadership focus on best practices or next practices? Journal of Educational Change, 9(1), 71-75. [Google Scholar]
  31. Little, J. W. (1981). School success and staff developments: The role of staff development in urban desegregated schools. Boulder, Colo.: Center for Action Research, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lopez-Yanez, J., & Sanchez-Moreno, M. (2013). Levers for sustainable improvement of Spanish schools in challenging contexts. Journal of Educational Change, 14(2), 203-232. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for social sciences (9th ed.). Vivar, Malaysia: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  34. Meyer, D. Z., & Avery, L. M. (2009). Excel as a qualitative data analysis tool. Field Methods, 21(1), 91–112. [Google Scholar]
  35. Newton, C., & Tarrant, T. (1992). Managing change in schools. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sanders, M. G., & Epstein, J. L. (2005). School-family-community partnerships and educational change: International perspectives. In A. Hargreaves, (Ed.). Extending educational change: International handbook of educational change. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer, 202-222. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wedell, M. (2009). Planning for educational change. London: Continuum International Publishing Group [Google Scholar]