PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1309-0682

Orjinal Araştırma Makalesi | Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2019, Cil. 13(27) 547-558

A Construct Validity Study of a Measure of Pre-Service Teachers' Micro-Teaching Performance

Kadir Kozan & Atakan Ata

ss. 547 - 558   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2019.185.26   |  Makale No: MANU-1809-30-0002.R2

Yayın tarihi: Mart 20, 2019  |   Okunma Sayısı: 22  |  İndirilme Sayısı: 130


Özet

The purpose of the present study was to examine the construct validity of an instrument used to measure the micro-teaching performance of teacher candidates by their supervisor teachers. To serve this purpose, this study employed an exploratory factor analysis and a parallel analysis in addition to a final confirmatory factor analysis conducted with two different samples of supervisor teachers who rated pre-service teachers’ performance. Overall, 477 mentor teachers participated in this study. The current results revealed a strong one-factor structure accompanied by high reliability statistics, which is in line with earlier research and theoretical insights. The identified one factor can be named as teaching effectiveness as measured by the participating mentor teachers.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Construct Validity, Micro-teaching, Teaching Effectiveness, Pre-Service Teachers


Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır?

APA 6th edition
Kozan, K. & Ata, A. (2019). A Construct Validity Study of a Measure of Pre-Service Teachers' Micro-Teaching Performance . Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(27), 547-558. doi: 10.29329/mjer.2019.185.26

Harvard
Kozan, K. and Ata, A. (2019). A Construct Validity Study of a Measure of Pre-Service Teachers' Micro-Teaching Performance . Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(27), pp. 547-558.

Chicago 16th edition
Kozan, Kadir and Atakan Ata (2019). "A Construct Validity Study of a Measure of Pre-Service Teachers' Micro-Teaching Performance ". Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 13 (27):547-558. doi:10.29329/mjer.2019.185.26.

Kaynakça
  1. AACTE. (n.d.). About EdTPA. Retrieved March 16, 2018, from http://edtpa.aacte.org/about-edtpa [Google Scholar]
  2. Arsal, Z. (2015). The effects of microteaching on the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 140-153. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ata, A., & Kozan, K. (2018). Factor analytic insights into micro-teaching performance of teacher candidates. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 5(1), 169-178. [Google Scholar]
  5. Benedict, A., Holdheide, L., Brownell, M., & Foley, A. M. (2016). Learning to Teach: Practice- Based Preparation in Teacher Education. Special Issues Brief. Washington. DC: American Institutes for Research. [Google Scholar]
  6. Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5-13. [Google Scholar]
  7. Broekkamp, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: A literature review, symposium, and questionnaire. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), pp. 203-220 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, E. L., Suh, J., Parsons, S. A., Parker, A. K., & Ramirez, E. M. (2015). Documenting teacher candidates' professional growth through performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Education, 25(1), 35-47. [Google Scholar]
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32, 470-483. [Google Scholar]
  10. Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D., Jin Gatlin, S., & Vasquez Heilig, J. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification. Teach for America and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 1-48. doi: 10.14507/epaa.v13n42.2005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Emsheimer, P., & Ljunggren de Silva, N. (2011). Preservice teachers' reflections on practice in relation to theories (pp. 1-15). In M. Mattsson, T. Eilertsen, D. Rorrison (Eds.), A practicum turn in teacher education. Rotterdam: Sense. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ericsson, K. A. (2014). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Florence, KY: Psychology Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gaikhorst, L., Beishuizen, J., Roosenboom, B., & Volman, M. (2017). The challenges of beginning teachers in urban primary schools. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 46-61. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005).  The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390 - 441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hennissen, P., Beckers, H., & Moerkerke, G. (2017). Linking practice to theory in teacher education: A growth in cognitive structures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 314-325. [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson, D., Johnson, B., Farenga, S., & Ness, D. (2005). Trivializing teacher education: The accreditation squeeze. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL 8.80 for Windows. Skokie, IL: Scientific 398 Software International, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kornfeld, J., Grady, K., Marker, P., & Ruddell, M. (2007). Caught in the current: A self-study of state-mandated compliance in a teacher education program. Teachers College Record, 109, 1902-1930. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kozan, K., & Richardson, J.C. (2014). New Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis           Insights into the Community of Inquiry Survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 39-47. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 226–243. doi:10.1177/0022487112473837 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Lenihan, E. (2016). Developing a culture of feedback through microteaching. The International Schools Journal, 35(2), 82-85. [Google Scholar]
  23. Levesque, C., Stanek, L. R., Zuehlke, A. N., & Ryan, R.M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 68–84. [Google Scholar]
  24. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor    analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. [Google Scholar]
  25. McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education a call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378-386. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nagro, S. A., deBettencourt, L. U., Rosenberg, M. S., Carran, D. T., & Weiss, M. P. (2017). The Effects of Guided Video Analysis on Teacher Candidates’ Reflective Ability and Instructional Skills. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(1), 7-25. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS suvival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for   Windows (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Open University Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rennert-Ariev, P. (2008). The hidden curriculum of performance based teacher education. Teachers College Record, 110, 105-138. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rust, F. O. C. (1994). The first year of teaching: It's not what they expected. Teaching and teacher education, 10(2), 205-217. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sleeter, C. (2008). Equity, democracy, and neo-liberal assaults on teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1947-1957. [Google Scholar]
  31. Stronge, J. H. (2012). Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System. Stronge & Associates. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  33. Watkins, M. W. (2000). Monte Carlo PCA for parallel analysis [computer software]. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yemez, İ. (2016). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile sosyal medya reklamlarına yönelik tutum ölçeğinin yapı geçerliliğinin incelenmesi: Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi IBF’de bir uygulama. C. Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(2), 97-118. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of teacher education, 61(1-2), 89-99. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376–382. [Google Scholar]