PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1309-0682

Orjinal Araştırma Makalesi | Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2019, Cil. 13(27) 400-417

Analysis of Studies Made for Mentally Disabled Students in the Mathematics Education: Turkey Example

Elif Kılıçoğlu & Ayşe Özben

ss. 400 - 417   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2019.185.17   |  Makale No: MANU-1901-15-0002.R1

Yayın tarihi: Mart 20, 2019  |   Okunma Sayısı: 44  |  İndirilme Sayısı: 123


Özet

In this study, it is aimed to analyse the studies made in the mathematics education for mentally disabled students. This study was carried out according to 7 different variables, which are research method, data collection tools, data analysis, sample type, sample size, researchers’ area of expertise and distribution of studies through years. In order to actualise these objective, researchers used various search engines such as Ulakbim, Dergipark, Google Academic websites and two state university screening engines and attained a total of 56 academic studies including 20 articles, 28 master’s theses and 8 doctoral theses. The attained academic studies were assorted and analyzed through the form prepared by researchers. The data were analyzed according to content analysis. The findings are presented as tables in descriptive form. The obtained data show that, the studies were mostly made with qualitative method (%87,4) and scale (%64,28) was used as data collection tool. Furthermore, it was ascertained that, in analyzed studies, more than other methods graphical analysis method (%64,28) was favoured. It was observed that the researchers generally preferred to study with the students (%64.28) and with a small sample. Finally, it has been determined that the studies conducted on this subject have been conducted by the researchers (%78,5) from the Special Education Department. It was discovered that, the researches gained momentum after 2008 and the first studies started during the 1980s. Based on these findings, it has been suggested to use different methods in the mathematics education for mental deficiency, to accomplish sufficient studies with different sample groups, to work mathematics and special education teachers together and thus to increase the studies on this matter.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Mathematics Education, Special Education, Mentally Disabled Students, Content Analysis


Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır?

APA 6th edition
Kilicoglu, E. & Ozben, A. (2019). Analysis of Studies Made for Mentally Disabled Students in the Mathematics Education: Turkey Example . Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(27), 400-417. doi: 10.29329/mjer.2019.185.17

Harvard
Kilicoglu, E. and Ozben, A. (2019). Analysis of Studies Made for Mentally Disabled Students in the Mathematics Education: Turkey Example . Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(27), pp. 400-417.

Chicago 16th edition
Kilicoglu, Elif and Ayse Ozben (2019). "Analysis of Studies Made for Mentally Disabled Students in the Mathematics Education: Turkey Example ". Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 13 (27):400-417. doi:10.29329/mjer.2019.185.17.

Kaynakça
  1. Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A. A., & Wakemanxya, S. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(4), 407-432. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cantimer, G. G., Şengül, S., & Akçin, N. (2017). Exploring the professional self-efficacy perceptions of the teachers of children in need of special education in terms of various variables. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 694-716. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cawley, J. F. (2002). Mathematics interventions and students with high-incidence disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 2-6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Çelenk, S. (2003). Okul başarısının ön koşulu: Okul aile dayanışması. İlköğretim Online, 2(2), 28-34. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ergün, M. (2015). Eğitim felsefesi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gast, D., Skouge, J., Tawney, J. (1984). Variations of the multiple baseline design: Multiple probe and changing criterion designs. In Tawney, J., Gast, D. (Eds.), Singles subject research in special education (pp. 226–268). Columbus, OH: Merrill. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gül, G. (2004). Birey toplum eğitim ve öğretmen. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 223-236. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. I., & Bransford, J. D. (1988). Developing math automatically in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20(6), 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kahyaoğlu, M., & Yangın, S. (2007). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının mesleki öz-yeterliklerine ilişkin görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 73-84. [Google Scholar]
  10. Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (30. Basım). İstanbul: Nobel Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  11. Katsiyannis, A., & Prillaman, D. (1990). Teaching math using regular curricula. Teaching Exceptional Children, 23(1), 26-29. [Google Scholar]
  12. Knight, V. F., Spooner, F., Browder, D. M., Smith, B. R., & Wood, C. L. (2013). Using systematic instruction and graphic organizers to teach science concepts to students with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28(2), 115-126. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97-114. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kroesbergen, E. H., Van Luit, J. E., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Mathematical learning difficulties and PASS cognitive processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 574-582. [Google Scholar]
  15. Luckasson, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntinx, W. H., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M. P., Reeve, A.,  & Tasse, M. J. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. Washington, DC, US: American Association on Mental Retardation. [Google Scholar]
  16. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2008). Özel Eğitim ve Rehabilitasyon Merkezi Zihinsel Engelli Bireyler Destek Eğitim Programı. Retrieved from https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2013_09/04010347_zihinselengellibireylerdestekeitimprogram.pdf, 10.08.2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2018). Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği. Retrieved from http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_07/09101900_ozel_egitim_hizmetleri_yonetmeligi_07072018.pdf, 12.09.2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sinoplu, K. (2009). Zihinsel engellilerde matematik öğretimi, (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sönmez, V. (2008). Program geliştirmede öğretmen el kitabı (14. Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sönmez, S. (2003). Türkiye’de öğretmen yetiştirmenin kısa tarihçesi ve yeniden yapılanma. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, , 7, 280-290. [Google Scholar]
  21. Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği programının matematiğe karşı özyeterlik algısına etkisi. Journal of Qafqaz University, 8(1), 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tezcan, S. (1985). Eğitim Sosyolojisi (4. Baskı). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]