PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1309-0682

Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2016, Cil. 10(19) 53-60

Examination of Relationships between Preservice Teachers' Confidence in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Strategies

Şenol ŞEN & Senar TEMEL

ss. 53 - 60   |  Makale No: mjer.2016.004

Yayın tarihi: Eylül 20, 2016  |   Okunma Sayısı: 65  |  İndirilme Sayısı: 60


Özet

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between pre-service teachers' confidence in technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning strategies. Moreover, the present study also analyzed the effect of gender on confidence in technological pedagogical content knowledge. The study was conducted with correlational research design. The study group of this study was comprised of 82 preservice teachers attending the Faculty of Education in a public university during the spring semester of the 2015-2016 academic years. In the study, the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Confidence Survey were used as data collection tools. Data were analyzed using Pearson product-moment correlation and independent samples t-test. At the end of the study, the results of independent samples t-test demonstrated that there was a significant difference in technological knowledge scores for males (M=4.24, SD=.65) and females [M=3.81, SD=.63; t(80)=-2.97, p=.004]. Besides, the results of this study revealed that there were various positive and significant correlations between variables of the study.

Anahtar Kelimeler: confidence, critical thinking, elaboration, metacognitive self-Regulation, organization, technological pedagogical content knowledge


Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır?

APA 6th edition
SEN, S. & TEMEL, S. (2016). Examination of Relationships between Preservice Teachers' Confidence in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Strategies. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(19), 53-60.

Harvard
SEN, S. and TEMEL, S. (2016). Examination of Relationships between Preservice Teachers' Confidence in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Strategies. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(19), pp. 53-60.

Chicago 16th edition
SEN, Senol and Senar TEMEL (2016). "Examination of Relationships between Preservice Teachers' Confidence in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Strategies". Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 10 (19):53-60.

Kaynakça
  • Akkoyunlu, B & Orhan, F. (2003). The relations between Computer use self-efficacy and demographical properties of the students of computer and instructional technologies education department. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 86-93.
  • Alba, C & Zubillaga, A. (2010). Teaching and ICT in higher education: Applications, training and needs perceived by the faculty at Complutense University. International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education, 3(3), 241 - 255.
  • Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & education, 52(1), 154-168.
  • Baylor, A., Shen, E. & Huang, X. (2003). Which pedagogical agent do learners choose? The effects of gender and ethnicity. In A. Rossett (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2003, 1507-1510). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Kahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 4(2), 207-239.
  • Chudgar, A., & Sankar, Z. (2008). The relationship between teacher gender and student achievement: Evidence from five Indian states. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 38(5), 627-642.
  • Einarsson, C., & Granström, K. (2002). Gender-biased interaction in the dassroom: the influence of gender and age in the relationship between teacher and pupil. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 117 - 127.
  • Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in Science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of in-service Science Teachers. TechTrends, Special Issue on TPACK, 53(5), 70-79.
  • Gündoğmuş, N., & Gündüz, Ş. (2015). Study on the technological pedagogical and content knowledge of teacher candidates and their learning strategies. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 2(2), 47-58.
  • Karadeniz, Ş., & Vatanartıran, S. (2015). Primary School Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Elementary Education Online, 14(3), 1017-1028.
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  • Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762.
  • Koppi, T., Sheard, J., Naghdy, F., Edwards, S. L., & Brookes, W. (2010). Towards a gender indusive information and communications technology curriculum: a perspective from graduates in the workforce. Computer Science Education, 20 (4), 265-282.
  • Lasen, M. (2010). Education and career pathways in Information Communication Technology: What are schoolgirls saying? Computers & Education, 54(4), 1117-1126.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach sdence and mathematics with technology: development a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M., Boekaerts & P. R., Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garda, T., & Mc Keachie, W. J. (1991). A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. Ann Arbor: Michigan. ED 338 122.
  • Sakız, G. & Yetkin Özdemir, İ. E. (2014). Özdüzenleme ve özdüzenlemeli öğrenme: Kuramsal bakış [Self- regulation and self-regulated learning: Theoretical perspective]. G. Sakız (Ed.), Özdüzenleme [Self- regulation] (s. 29-47). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4­14.
  • Timur, B., & Taşar, M. F. (2011). The adaptation of the technological pedagogical content knowledge confidence survey into Turkish. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 839 -856.
  • Yeşil, R. (2009). Training qualifications of social studies candidate teachers in dass (the sample of Kırşehir). Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 23-48.
  • Yılmaz, M. (2007). Instructional technology in training primary school teacher. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 27(1), 155-167.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Self-Regulation: Theory, Research, and Applications (13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.